CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Insects as feed: Gendered knowledge attitudes and practices among poultry and Pond Fish farmers in Kenya

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Waithanji, E.
    Affognon, D.H.
    King’ori, S.
    Diiro, G.
    Nakimbugwe, D.
    Fiaboe, K.K.
    Date
    2019
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Usage rights
    Copyrighted; all rights reserved
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Waithanji, E., Affognon, D.H., King’ori, S., Diiro, G., Nakimbugwe, D. & Fiaboe, K.K. (2019). Insects as feed: Gendered knowledge attitudes and practices among poultry and Pond Fish farmers in Kenya. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 1-15.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108807
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100312
    Abstract/Description
    This qualitative study on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) among poultry and pond fish farmers from Kisii, Nakuru and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya was conducted to establish insect for feed interventions likely to reduce the cost of feeds in these enterprises and benefit women and men equitably. Data were collected through sex and enterprise type disaggregated focus group discussions with farmers. Poultry farming was more established than fish farming in all three counties. Women were more involved than men in poultry, and men more than women in fish, farming. For both enterprises, women did same number of chores as men except for fish in the dry season when women did more chores. For most chores, women worked longer than men. Men and women knew of many insects fed raw to chicken and fish. Men stated that insect fed chickens are bigger and women affirmed that they are tastier. For both enterprises, men mainly decided on allocation of money jointly with women, or alone. Women mainly decided on allocation of feeding resources. Because gender roles were more clearly defined in poultry enterprises, it would be more useful to start conducting gender targeted interventions with poultry farmers. Among the interventions recommended include insect farming technologies at the homestead for women and wild insect catching technologies for women and men. Surplus insects farmed / harvested can be sold to commercial feed processors through contractual arrangements between them and the producers. Advocacy interventions to prevent economically dormant men taking over insect rearing enterprises from women once they become profitable, and time saving technologies for use by time-poor women are also recommended.
    Notes
    Published online: 06 Nov 2019
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Roots, Tubers and Bananas
    AGROVOC Keywords
    insecta; feeds; technology; gender; kenya; poultry farming; insect farming
    Subjects
    AGRIBUSINESS; BIODIVERSITY; GENDER; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PESTS OF PLANTS; POST-HARVESTING TECHNOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMY
    Countries
    Kenya
    Regions
    Africa; Eastern Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development; International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology; Makerere University; International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
    Investors/sponsors
    International Development Research Centre; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
    Collections
    • IITA Journal Articles [4608]

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback