Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuintero-Anzueta, Stivenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Botero, Isabel Cristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Navas, Juan Sebastianen_US
dc.contributor.authorRao, Idupulapati M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChirinda, Ngonidzasheen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarahona Rosales, Rolandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoorby, Jonen_US
dc.contributor.authorArango, Jacoboen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T08:25:40Zen_US
dc.date.available2021-08-03T08:25:40Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/114525en_US
dc.titleNutritional evaluation of tropical forage grass alone and grass-legume diets to reduce in vitro methane productionen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR multi-centreen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractForage grass nutritional quality directly affects animal feed intake, productivity, and enteric methane (CH4) emissions. This study evaluated the nutritional quality, in vitro enteric CH4 emission potential, and optimization of diets based on two widely grown tropical forage grasses either alone or mixed with legumes. The grasses Urochloa hybrid cv. Cayman (UHC) and U. brizantha cv. Toledo (UBT), which typically have low concentrations of crude protein (CP), were incubated in vitro either alone or mixed with the legumes Canavalia brasiliensis (CB) and Leucaena diversifolia (LD), which have higher CP concentrations. Substitution of 30% of the grass dry matter (DM) with CB or LD did not affect gas production or DM degradability. After 96h of incubation, accumulated CH4 was 87.3mg CH4 g−1 DM and 107.7mg CH4 g−1 DM for the grasses alone (UHC and UBT, respectively), and 100.7mg CH4 g−1 DM and 113.2mg CH4 g−1 DM for combined diets (70% grass, 15% CB, and 15% LD). Diets that combined legumes (CB or LC) and grass (UHC or UBT) had higher CP contents, gross, and metabolizable energy (GE, ME, respectively) densities, as well as lower concentrations of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL). The ME and nutritional variables such as NFD, tannins (T), and CP showed a positive correlation with in vitro net gas production, while ruminal digestibility was affected by CP, ADL, T, and GE. Optimal ratios of components for ruminant diets to reduce rumen net gas production and increase protein content were found with mixtures consisting of 60% grass (either UHC or UBT), 30% CB, and 10% LD. However, this ratio did not result in a decrease in CH4 production.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.audienceFarmersen_US
dcterms.audienceGeneral Publicen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationQuintero-Anzuela, S.; Molina-Botero, I.C.; Ramirez-Navas, J.S.; Rao, I.; Chirinda, N.; Barahona-Rosales, R.; Moorby, J.; Arango, J. (2021) Nutritional evaluation of tropical forage grass alone and grass-legume diets to reduce in vitro methane production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5:663003. ISSN: 2571-581Xen_US
dcterms.extent13 p.en_US
dcterms.issued2021-06-14en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dcterms.subjectforageen_US
dcterms.subjectfeed legumesen_US
dcterms.subjectnutritive valueen_US
dcterms.subjectlivestocken_US
dcterms.subjectmethane emissionen_US
dcterms.subjectforrajesen_US
dcterms.subjectleguminosas forrajerasen_US
dcterms.subjectganadoen_US
dcterms.subjectemisiones de metanoen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationAlliance of Bioversity International and CIATen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversidad del Valleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Santiago de Calien_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Nacional Agraria, Peruen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationAgricultural Innovations and Technology Transfer Centreen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationAberystwyth Universityen_US
cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.663003/fullen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.663003en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.contributor.crpLivestocken_US
cg.subject.alliancebiovciatLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.subject.alliancebiovciatTROPICAL FORAGESen_US
cg.creator.identifierJacobo Arango: 0000-0002-4828-9398en_US
cg.creator.identifierIdupulapati M. Rao: 0000-0002-8381-9358en_US
cg.creator.identifierNgonidzashe Chirinda: 0000-0002-4213-6294en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systemsen_US
cg.issn2571-581Xen_US
cg.volume5en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record