CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR inter-center and system collaborations
    • CGIAR System-wide Livestock Programme
    • SLP - articles in journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR inter-center and system collaborations
    • CGIAR System-wide Livestock Programme
    • SLP - articles in journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Feed quality and animal performance

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Coleman, S.W.
    Moore, J.E.
    Date
    2003-11
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Coleman,S.W. and J. E. Moore. 2003. Feed quality and animal performance. Field Crops Research 84(1-2): 17-29
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/197
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00138-2
    Abstract/Description
    A sound theoretical definition for forage or feed quality is animal performance. This definition may be useful as a relative comparison among forages when given to growing or lactating animals. Voluntary intake and nutrient digestibility have been used to form indices of forage quality, and most feeding standards and models are based on the assumption that animal performance is related closely to intake of available nutrients. Due to variation in measurements of intake, digestibility, and animal performance, however, relationships used to develop prediction equations for animal performance from intake and digestibility are often less accurate than desired. Some of the causes for inaccurate predictions include nutrient imbalances, environmental constraints on the animals used for measurements, and individual animal differences. Variation in voluntary intake is greater than that for digestibility, and appears to be more important in assessment of forage quality. Yet intake is more difficult to determine in animal trials and to predict from forage characteristics. To be useful in livestock feeding, forage quality information must be available before feeding. Due to expense, labor, time, and amount of the feed required, animal trials are not suitable for screening large numbers of feeds or forages such as those from genetic improvement trials. Therefore, prediction of forage quality from feed attributes taken from small samples is necessary. Chemical composition, in vitro bioassays, and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy have been used successfully to predict intake and digestibility of defined sample sets such as those from genetic improvement trials, but have been more difficult to implement on unknown or open populations such as producer samples. The challenge to progress in this area is obtaining accurate intake, digestibility and performance data on an adequate number of samples under standardized conditions so that a suitable database is available for development of either robust equations, or equations with sufficient specificity to discriminate among different forage and genetic types.
    Notes
    Supported by the CGIAR System-wide Livestock Programme
    Subjects
    ANIMAL FEEDING; FEEDS; CROP-LIVESTOCK; FODDER;
    Investors/sponsors
    Department for International Development, United Kingdom; CGIAR Systemwide Livestock Programme
    Collections
    • SLP - articles in journals [33]

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback