Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLarson, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorRibot, J.C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T09:13:14Z
dc.date.available2012-06-04T09:13:14Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationLarson, A.M., Ribot, J.C. 2009. Lessons from forestry decentralisation . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds).. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :175-190. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5..
dc.identifier.isbn978-6-02-869303-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/20288
dc.description.abstractREDD+ is more likely to be just and locally legitimate if the design, implementation and allocation of benefits represent local needs and aspirations. Decentralisation of meaningful decisions to locally accountable and responsive (e.g., representative) local authorities would promote local engagement in REDD+ decision making. The level at which rules are made and benefits distributed will be a key issue in the legitimacy, effectiveness, efficiency and equity of REDD+.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)en_US
dc.subjectCLIMATE CHANGE
dc.subjectDECENTRALIZATION
dc.subjectGOVERNANCE
dc.subjectFOREST MANAGEMENT
dc.titleLessons from forestry decentralisation
dc.typeBook Chapter
cg.identifier.statusOpen Access
cg.subject.ciforCLIMATE CHANGE
cg.identifier.urlhttp://www.cifor.org/nc/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/2909.html


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record