Site selection for forest carbon projects
MetadataShow full item record
<div style="margin-bottom: 5px;">Countries with a higher biodiversity index and jurisdictions with more protected area are more likely to have forest carbon projects, corroborating proponents' assertions that they consider biodiversity co-benefits when selecting sites. </div><div style="margin-bottom: 5px;">Jurisdictions with higher deforestation rates and forest carbon densities in Brazil and Indonesia are more likely to have forest carbon projects, consistent with a focus on additionality. However, projects also tend to be located in more remote (and possibly less threatened) areas in Brazil. </div>Villages inside project boundaries (in a sample of REDD+ projects studied by CIFOR) depend largely on agriculture, emphasising the challenge of reducing deforestation without undermining agriculturebased livelihoods.
- CIFOR Test Harvesting